The FTB has concluded that a company that places online advertisements, and therefore may not be aware of the physical address of the business, may use the company billing address in place of a customer’s physical location to apportion its income to California. (Chief Counsel Ruling 2011-1, August 23, 2011) The company places online advertisements among a network of publishers. Advertisers place online ads on the publishers’ Web sites to reach viewers that match the advertiser’s target audience.
To compute the sales factor, sales of services are attributable to California if a greater proportion of the income-producing activity is performed in California than in any other state, based upon the costs of performance. A taxpayer must include the activities of, and payments made to, agents and independent contractors who perform activities on behalf of the taxpayer when making its costs of performance analysis. However, assigning the location of the publishers’ income-producing activities is problematic in cyberspace. The publishers’ income-producing activities occur across the country, and they do not indicate the state where the activities will be performed. They also do not indicate how much of the payments are associated with performance in what state, nor where the income-producing activities are performed. Therefore, the company activities must be assigned to the billing address of the customer by assuming that the customer’s activities are actively managed, directed, or controlled from the customers’ billing addresses.
At Spidell’s Federal/California Tax Update Seminar we will talk about:
-
What property tax is deductible
-
How the new federal Schedule D works
-
How to treat the sale of gold and silver
-
What happens if your client is selling stuff on e-Bay
-
New laws coming this year and old laws going away
Click here to register today.
